Everything about Rna Interference totally explained
RNA interference (
RNAi) is a mechanism that inhibits
gene expression at the stage of
translation or by hindering the
transcription of specific genes. RNAi targets include RNA from
viruses and
transposons (significant for some forms of innate
immune response), and also plays a role in
regulating development and
genome maintenance.
Small interfering RNA strands (siRNA) are key to the RNAi process, and have
complementary nucleotide sequences to the targeted RNA strand. Specific RNAi pathway proteins are guided by the siRNA to the targeted
messenger RNA (mRNA), where they "cleave" the target, breaking it down into smaller portions that can no longer be translated into protein. A type of RNA transcribed from the genome itself,
microRNA (miRNA), works in the same way.
The RNAi pathway is initiated by the enzyme
dicer, which cleaves long, dsRNA molecules into short fragments of 20–25
base pairs. One of the two strands of each fragment, known as the
guide strand, is then incorporated into the
RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) and pairs with complementary sequences. The most well-studied outcome of this recognition event is
post-transcriptional gene silencing. This occurs when the guide strand specifically pairs with an mRNA molecule and induces the degradation by
argonaute, the catalytic component of the RISC complex. Another outcome is
epigenetic changes to a gene –
histone modification and
DNA methylation – affecting the degree the gene is transcribed.
The selective and robust effect of RNAi on gene expression makes it a valuable research tool, both in
cell culture and in living organisms because synthetic dsRNA introduced into cells can induce suppression of specific genes of interest. RNAi may also be used for large-scale screens that systematically shut down each gene in the cell, which can help identify the components necessary for a particular cellular process or an event such as
cell division. Exploitation of the pathway is also a promising tool in
biotechnology and
medicine.
Historically, RNA interference was known by other names, including
post transcriptional gene silencing, transgene silencing, and quelling. Only after these apparently-unrelated processes were fully understood did it become clear that they all described the RNAi phenomenon. RNAi has also been confused with
antisense suppression of gene expression, which doesn't act catalytically to degrade mRNA, but instead involves single-stranded RNA fragments physically binding to mRNA and blocking protein
translation. In 2006,
Andrew Fire and
Craig C. Mello shared the
Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their work on RNA interference in the
nematode worm
C. elegans, which they published in 1998.
Cellular mechanism
RNAi is an RNA-dependent
gene silencing process that's controlled by the
RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) and is initiated by short double-stranded RNA molecules in a cell's
cytoplasm, where they interact with the catalytic RISC component
argonaute.
dsRNA cleavage
Exogenous dsRNA initiates RNAi by activating the
ribonuclease protein
dicer, which binds and cleaves double-stranded RNAs (dsRNA)s to produce double-stranded fragments of 20–25
base pairs with a few unpaired overhang bases on each end.
Bioinformatics studies on the genomes of multiple organisms suggest this length maximizes target-gene specificity and minimizes non-specific effects. These short double-stranded fragments are called small interfering RNAs (
siRNAs). These siRNAs are then separated into single strands and integrated into an active RISC complex. After integration into the RISC, siRNAs base-pair to their target mRNA and induce cleavage of the mRNA, thereby preventing it from being used as a
translation template.
Exogenous dsRNA is detected and bound by an effector protein, known as RDE-4 in
C. elegans and R2D2 in
Drosophila, that stimulates dicer activity. This protein only binds long dsRNAs, but the mechanism producing this length specificity is unknown.
This initiation pathway may be amplified by the cell through the synthesis of a population of 'secondary' siRNAs using the dicer-produced initiating or 'primary' siRNAs as templates. These siRNAs are structurally distinct from dicer-produced siRNAs and appear to be produced by an
RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP).
MicroRNA
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are
genomically encoded
non-coding RNAs that help regulate
gene expression, particularly during
development. The phenomenon of RNA interference, broadly defined, includes the endogenously induced gene silencing effects of miRNAs as well as silencing triggered by foreign dsRNA. Mature miRNAs are structurally similar to siRNAs produced from exogenous dsRNA, but before reaching maturity, miRNAs must first undergo extensive
post-transcriptional modification. An miRNA is expressed from a much longer RNA-coding gene as a
primary transcript known as a
pri-miRNA which is processed, in the
cell nucleus, to a 70-nucleotide
stem-loop structure called a
pre-miRNA by the microprocessor complex. This complex consists of an
RNase III enzyme called
Drosha and a dsRNA-binding protein
Pasha. The dsRNA portion of this pre-miRNA is bound and cleaved by dicer to produce the mature miRNA molecule that can be integrated into the RISC complex; thus, miRNA and siRNA share the same cellular machinery downstream of their initial processing.
The siRNAs derived from long dsRNA precursors differ from miRNAs in that miRNAs, especially those in animals, typically have incomplete base pairing to a target and inhibit the translation of many different mRNAs with similar sequences. In contrast, siRNAs typically base-pair perfectly and induce mRNA cleavage only in a single, specific target. In
Drosophila and
C. elegans, miRNA and siRNA are processed by distinct argonaute proteins and dicer enzymes.
RISC activation and catalysis
The active components of an
RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) are
endonucleases called
argonaute proteins, which cleave the target mRNA strand
complementary to their bound siRNA. Although it was first believed that an
ATP-dependent
helicase separated these two strands, the process is actually ATP-independent and performed directly by the protein components of RISC. The strand selected as the guide tends to be the one whose
5' end is least paired to its complement, but strand selection is unaffected by the direction in which dicer cleaves the dsRNA before RISC incorporation. Instead, the R2D2 protein may serve as the differentiating factor by binding the more-stable 5' end of the passenger strand.
The structural basis for binding of RNA to the argonaute protein was examined by
X-ray crystallography of the binding
domain of an RNA-bound argonaute protein. Here, the
phosphorylated 5' end of the RNA strand enters a
conserved basic surface
pocket and makes contacts through a
divalent cation (an atom with two positive charges) such as
magnesium and by
aromatic stacking (a process that allows more than one atom to share an electron by passing it back and forth) between the 5' nucleotide in the siRNA and a conserved
tyrosine residue. This site is thought to form a nucleation site for the binding of the siRNA to its mRNA target.
It isn't understood how the activated RISC complex locates complementary mRNAs within the cell. Although the cleavage process has been proposed to be linked to
translation, translation of the mRNA target isn't essential for RNAi-mediated degradation. Indeed, RNAi may be more effective against mRNA targets that are not translated. Argonaute proteins, the catalytic components of RISC, are localized to specific regions in the
cytoplasm called
P-bodies (also cytoplasmic bodies or GW bodies), which are regions with high rates of mRNA decay; miRNA activity is also clustered in P-bodies. Disruption of P-bodies decreases the efficiency of RNA interference, suggesting that they're the site of a critical step in the RNAi process.
Transcriptional silencing
Components of the RNA interference pathway are also used in many eukaryotes in the maintenance of the organisation and structure of their
genomes. Modification of
histones and associated induction of
heterochromatin formation serves to downregulate genes pre-
transcriptionally; this process is referred to as
RNA-induced transcriptional silencing (RITS), and is carried out by a complex of proteins called the RITS complex. In
fission yeast this complex contains
argonaute, a
chromodomain protein Chp1, and a protein called Tas3 of unknown function. As a consequence, the induction and spread of heterochromatic regions requires the argonaute and RdRP proteins. Indeed, deletion of these genes in the fission yeast
S. pombe disrupts
histone methylation and
centromere formation, causing slow or stalled
anaphase during
cell division. In some cases, similar processes associated with histone modification have been observed to transcriptionally upregulate genes.
The mechanism by which the RITS complex induces heterochromatin formation and organization isn't well understood, and most studies have focused on the
mating-type region in fission yeast, which may not be representative of activities in other genomic regions or organisms. In maintenance of existing heterochromatin regions, RITS forms a complex with siRNAs
complementary to the local genes and stably binds local methylated histones, acting co-transcriptionally to degrade any nascent pre-mRNA transcripts that are initiated by
RNA polymerase. The formation of such a heterochromatin region, though not its maintenance, is dicer-dependent, presumably because dicer is required to generate the initial complement of siRNAs that target subsequent transcripts. Heterochromatin maintenance has been suggested to function as a self-reinforcing feedback loop, as new siRNAs are formed from the occasional nascent transcripts by RdRP for incorporation into local RITS complexes. The relevance of observations from fission yeast mating-type regions and centromeres to
mammals isn't clear, as heterochromatin maintenance in mammalian cells may be independent of the components of the RNAi pathway.
Variation among organisms
Organisms vary in their ability to take up foreign dsRNA and use it in the RNAi pathway. The effects of RNA interference can be both systemic and heritable in plants and
C. elegans, although not in
Drosophila or
mammals. In plants, RNAi is thought to propagate by the transfer of siRNAs between cells through
plasmodesmata (channels in the cell walls that enable communication and transport). A broad general distinction between plants and animals lies in the targeting of endogenously produced miRNAs; in plants, miRNAs are usually perfectly or nearly perfectly complementary to their target genes and induce direct mRNA cleavage by RISC, while animals' miRNAs tend to be more divergent in sequence and induce translational repression.
Some eukaryotic protozoa such as
Leishmania major and
Trypanosoma cruzi lack the RNAi pathway entirely. Most or all of the components are also missing in some
fungi, most notably the
model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Certain
ascomycetes and
basidiomycetes are also missing RNA interference pathways; this observation indicates that proteins required for RNA silencing have been lost independently from many fungal
lineages, possibly due to the evolution of a novel pathway with similar function, or to the lack of selective advantage in certain
niches.
Related prokaryotic systems
Gene expression in prokaryotes is influenced by an RNA-based system similar in some respects to RNAi. Here, RNA-encoding genes control mRNA abundance or translation by producing a complementary RNA that binds to an mRNA by base pairing. However these regulatory RNAs are not generally considered to be analogous to miRNAs because the dicer enzyme isn't involved. It has been suggested that
CRISPR systems in prokaryotes are analogous to eukaryotic RNA interference systems, although none of the protein components are
orthologous.
Biological functions
Immunity
RNA interference is a vital part of the
immune response to
viruses and other foreign
genetic material, especially in plants where it may also prevent self-propagation by
transposons. Plants such as
Arabidopsis thaliana express multiple dicer
homologs that are specialized to react differently when the plant is exposed to different types of viruses. Even before the RNAi pathway was fully understood, it was known that induced gene silencing in plants could spread throughout the plant in a systemic effect, and could be transferred from stock to scion plants via
grafting. This phenomenon has since been recognized as a feature of the plant adaptive immune system, and allows the entire plant to respond to a virus after an initial localized encounter. In response, many plant viruses have evolved elaborate mechanisms that suppress the RNAi response in plant cells. These include viral proteins that bind short double-stranded RNA fragments with single-stranded overhang ends, such as those produced by the action of dicer. Some plant genomes also express endogenous siRNAs in response to infection by specific types of
bacteria. These effects may be part of a generalized response to pathogens that downregulates any metabolic processes in the host that aid the infection process.
Although animals generally express fewer variants of the dicer enzyme than plants, RNAi in some animals has also been shown to produce an antiviral response. In both juvenile and adult
Drosophila, RNA interference is important in antiviral
innate immunity and is active against pathogens such as
Drosophila X virus. A similar role in immunity may operate in
C. elegans, as argonaute proteins are upregulated in response to viruses and worms that overexpress components of the RNAi pathway are resistant to viral infection.
The role of RNA interference in mammalian innate immunity is poorly understood, and relatively little data is available. However, the existence of viruses that encode genes able to suppress the RNAi response in mammalian cells may be evidence in favour of an RNAi-dependent mammalian immune response. However, this hypothesis of RNAi-mediated immunity in mammals has been challenged as poorly substantiated. Alternative functions for RNAi in mammalian viruses also exist, such as miRNAs expressed by the
herpes virus that may act as
heterochromatin organization triggers to mediate viral latency.
Downregulation of genes
Endogenously expressed
miRNAs, including both
intronic and
intergenic miRNAs, are most important in
translational repression The role of endogenously expressed miRNA in downregulating
gene expression was first described in
C. elegans in 1993. In plants this function was discovered when the "JAW microRNA" of
Arabidopsis was shown to be involved in the regulation of several genes that control plant shape. In plants, the majority of genes regulated by miRNAs are
transcription factors; thus miRNA activity is particularly wide-ranging and regulates entire
gene networks during development by modulating the expression of key regulatory genes, including transcription factors as well as
F-box proteins. In many organisms, including humans, miRNAs have also been linked to the formation of
tumors and dysregulation of the
cell cycle. Here, miRNAs can function as both
oncogenes and
tumor suppressors.
Upregulation of genes
RNA sequences (siRNA and miRNA) that are complementary to parts of a promoter can increase gene transcription, a phenomenon dubbed
RNA activation. Part of the mechanism for how these RNA upregulate genes is known:
dicer and
argonaute are involved, and there's
histone demethylation.
Crosstalk with RNA editing
The type of
RNA editing that's most prevalent in higher eukaryotes converts
adenosine nucleotides into
inosine in dsRNAs via the enzyme
adenosine deaminase (ADAR). It was originally proposed in 2000 that the RNAi and A→I RNA editing pathways might compete for a common dsRNA substrate. Indeed, some pre-miRNAs do undergo A→I RNA editing, and this mechanism may regulate the processing and expression of mature miRNAs. Further support for this model comes from studies on ADAR-null
C. elegans strains indicating that A→I RNA editing may counteract RNAi silencing of endogenous genes and transgenes.
Evolution
Based on
parsimony-based phylogenetic analysis, the
most recent common ancestor of all
eukaryotes most likely already possessed an early RNA interference pathway; the absence of the pathway in certain eukaryotes is thought to be a derived characteristic. This ancestral RNAi system probably contained at least one
dicer-like protein, one
argonaute, one
PIWI protein, and an
RNA-dependent RNA polymerase that may have also played other cellular roles. A large-scale
comparative genomics study likewise indicates that the eukaryotic
crown group already possessed these components, which may then have had closer functional associations with generalized RNA degradation systems such as the
exosome. This study also suggests that the RNA-binding argonaute protein family, which is shared among eukaryotes, most archaea, and at least some bacteria (such as
Aquifex aeolicus), is homologous to and originally evolved from components of the
translation initiation system.
The ancestral function of the RNAi system is generally agreed to have been immune defense against exogenous genetic elements such as
transposons and
viral genomes. Related functions such as
histone modification may have already been present in the ancestor of modern eukaryotes, although other functions such as regulation of development by miRNA are thought to have evolved later.
Technological applications
Gene knockdown
The RNA interference pathway is often exploited in experimental biology to study the function of genes in
cell culture and
in vivo in
model organisms.
Extensive efforts in
computational biology have been directed toward the design of successful dsRNA reagents that maximize gene knockdown but minimize "off-target" effects. Off-target effects arise when an introduced RNA has a base sequence that can pair with and thus reduce the expression of multiple genes at a time. Such problems occur more frequently when the dsRNA contains repetitive sequences. It has been estimated from studying the genomes of
H. sapiens,
C. elegans, and
S. pombe that about 10% of possible siRNAs will have substantial off-target effects. mammal-specific, and virus-specific siRNAs that are automatically checked for possible cross-reactivity.
Depending on the organism and experimental system, the exogenous RNA may be a long strand designed to be cleaved by dicer, or short RNAs designed to serve as siRNA substrates. In most
mammalian cells, shorter RNAs are used because long double-stranded RNA molecules induce the mammalian
interferon response, a form of
innate immunity that reacts nonspecifically to foreign genetic material. Mouse
oocytes and cells from early mouse
embryos lack this reaction to exogenous dsRNA and are therefore a common model system for studying gene-knockdown effects in mammals. Specialized laboratory techniques have also been developed to improve the utility of RNAi in mammalian systems by avoiding the direct introduction of siRNA, for example, by stable
transfection with a
plasmid encoding the appropriate sequence from which siRNAs can be transcribed, or by more elaborate
lentiviral vector systems allowing the inducible activation or deactivation of transcription, known as
conditional RNAi.
Functional genomics
Most
functional genomics applications of RNAi in animals have used
C. elegans and
Drosophila, as these are the common
model organisms in which RNAi is most effective.
C. elegans is particularly useful for RNAi research for two reasons: firstly, the effects of the gene silencing are generally heritable, and secondly because delivery of the dsRNA is extremely simple. Through a mechanism whose details are poorly understood, bacteria such as
E. coli that carry the desired dsRNA can be fed to the worms and will transfer their RNA payload to the worm via the intestinal tract. This "delivery by feeding" is just as effective at inducing gene silencing as more costly and time-consuming delivery methods, such as soaking the worms in dsRNA solution and injecting dsRNA into the gonads. Although delivery is more difficult in most other organisms, efforts are also underway to undertake large-scale genomic screening applications in cell culture with mammalian cells.
Approaches to the design of genome-wide RNAi libraries can require more sophistication than the design of a single siRNA for a defined set of experimental conditions.
Artificial neural networks are frequently used to design siRNA libraries and to predict their likely efficiency at gene knockdown. Mass genomic screening is widely seen as a promising method for
genome annotation and has triggered the development of high-throughput screening methods based on
microarrays. However, the utility of these screens and the ability of techniques developed on model organisms to generalize to even closely-related species has been questioned, for example from
C. elegans to related parasitic nematodes.
Functional genomics using RNAi is a particularly attractive technique for genomic mapping and annotation in plants because many plants are
polyploid, which presents substantial challenges for more traditional genetic engineering methods. For example, RNAi has been successfully used for functional genomics studies in
bread wheat (which is hexaploid) as well as more common plant model systems
Arabidopsis and
maize.
Medicine
It may be possible to exploit RNA interference in therapy. Although it's difficult to introduce long dsRNA strands into mammalian cells due to the
interferon response, the use of
short interfering RNA mimics has been more successful. Among the first applications to reach
clinical trials were in the treatment of
macular degeneration and
respiratory syncytial virus, RNAi has also been shown to be effective in the reversal of induced liver failure in mouse models.
Other proposed clinical uses center on antiviral therapies, including the inhibition of viral gene expression in cancerous cells, knockdown of host receptors and coreceptors for
HIV, the silencing of
hepatitis A and
hepatitis B genes, silencing of
influenza gene expression, and inhibition of
measles viral replication. Potential treatments for
neurodegenerative diseases have also been proposed, with particular attention being paid to the polyglutamine diseases such as
Huntington's disease. RNA interference is also often seen as a promising way to treat
cancer by silencing genes differentially upregulated in
tumor cells or genes involved in
cell division. A key area of research in the use of RNAi for clinical applications is the development of a safe delivery method, which to date has involved mainly
viral vector systems similar to those suggested for
gene therapy.
Despite the proliferation of promising cell culture studies for RNAi-based drugs, some concern has been raised regarding the safety of RNA interference, especially the potential for "off-target" effects in which a gene with a coincidentally similar sequence to the targeted gene is also repressed. A computational genomics study estimated that the error rate of off-target interactions is about 10%.
Biotechnology
RNA interference has been used for applications in
biotechnology, particularly in the engineering of food plants that produce lower levels of natural plant toxins. Such techniques take advantage of the stable and heritable RNAi phenotype in plant stocks. For example,
cotton seeds are rich in
dietary protein but naturally contain the toxic
terpenoid product
gossypol, making them unsuitable for human consumption. RNAi has been used to produce cotton stocks whose seeds contain reduced levels of
delta-cadinene synthase, a key enzyme in gossypol production, without affecting the enzyme's production in other parts of the plant, where gossypol is important in preventing damage from plant pests. Similar efforts have been directed toward the reduction of the
cyanogenic natural product
linamarin in
cassava plants.
Although no plant products that use RNAi-based
genetic engineering have yet passed the experimental stage, development efforts have successfully reduced the levels of
allergens in
tomato plants and decreased the precursors of likely
carcinogens in
tobacco plants. Other plant traits that have been engineered in the laboratory include the production of non-
narcotic natural products by the
opium poppy, resistance to common plant viruses, and fortification of plants such as tomatoes with dietary
antioxidants. Previous commercial products, including the
Flavr Savr tomato and two
cultivars of
ringspot-resistant
papaya, were originally developed using
antisense technology but likely exploited the RNAi pathway.
History and discovery
The discovery of RNAi was preceded first by observations of transcriptional inhibition by
antisense RNA expressed in
transgenic plants, and more directly by reports of unexpected outcomes in experiments performed by plant scientists in the
U.S. and
The Netherlands in the early 1990s. In an attempt to alter
flower colors in
petunias, researchers introduced additional copies of a gene encoding
chalcone synthase, a key enzyme for flower
pigmentation into petunia plants of normally pink or violet flower color. The overexpressed gene was expected to result in darker flowers, but instead produced less pigmented, fully or partially white flowers, indicating that the activity of chalcone synthase had been substantially decreased; in fact, both the endogenous genes and the transgenes were downregulated in the white flowers. Soon after, a related event termed
quelling was noted in the
fungus Neurospora crassa, although it wasn't immediately recognized as related. Further investigation of the phenomenon in plants indicated that the downregulation was due to post-transcriptional inhibition of gene expression via an increased rate of mRNA degradation. This phenomenon was called
co-suppression of gene expression, but the molecular mechanism remained unknown.
Not long after, plant
virologists working on improving plant resistance to viral diseases observed a similar unexpected phenomenon. While it was known that plants expressing virus-specific proteins showed enhanced tolerance or resistance to viral infection, it wasn't expected that plants carrying only short, non-coding regions of viral RNA sequences would show similar levels of protection. Researchers believed that viral RNA produced by transgenes could also inhibit viral replication. The reverse experiment, in which short sequences of plant genes were introduced into viruses, showed that the targeted gene was suppressed in an infected plant. This phenomenon was labeled "virus-induced gene silencing" (VIGS), and the set of such phenomena were collectively called
post transcriptional gene silencing.
After these initial observations in plants, many laboratories around the world searched for the occurrence of this phenomenon in other organisms.
Craig C. Mello and
Andrew Fire's 1998
Nature paper reported a potent gene silencing effect after injecting double stranded RNA into
C. elegans.
In investigating the regulation of muscle protein production, they observed that neither mRNA nor
antisense RNA injections had an effect on protein production, but double-stranded RNA successfully silenced the targeted gene. As a result of this work, they coined the term
RNAi. Fire and Mello's discovery was particularly notable because it represented the first identification of the causative agent for the phenomenon. Fire and Mello were awarded the
Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2006 for their work.
[Further Information]
Get more info on 'Rna Interference'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://rna_interference.totallyexplained.com">RNA interference Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |